ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.




----- Original Message -----
From: "Austin Franklin" <darkroom@ix.netcom.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, October 23, 2001 11:56 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Re: Hello, thanks, and more.



> One of the new features of the upcoming release of Polacolor
> Insight is the
> ability to use one of several

> decimation

>^^^^^^^^^^^^^

> techniques from nearest
> neighbor(lowest quality) to bicubic(highest quality also longer). Your
> choice would depend on use.
> David

>David,
>
>I'm very impressed!  Someone actually used the correct term for this!  Will
>the documentation actually use this term?
>
>;-)

Strictly speaking decimation means remove 1 in 10 hence the "dec" so it's
definitely NOT the correct term even if some illiterate yank coined the
phrase.
;-)

Personally I use down-sample (and up-sample for the reverse).








 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.