Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X

["Mikael Risedal" <risedal@hotmail.com>]

>From: "Mikael Risedal" <risedal@hotmail.com>
>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X
>Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 19:10:55
(Answer 2 same question as before, but the right adress to Photodo.
A lens are sharper in the middle, I suggest that you go to
http://www.photodo.com  and look under products
MTF tests of lenses by Lars Kjellberg the best lens test site in the world 
or read Norman Koren page http://www.normankoren.com/
Mikael Risedal
>
>>From: "Anthony Atkielski" <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr>
>>Reply-To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
>>To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
>>Subject: Re: filmscanners: NIKON LS 4000 AND D1X
>>Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2001 20:30:30 +0200
>>
>>Steve writes:
>>
>> > But you do have the advantage that the centre is
>> > invariably sharper, often much sharper, than the edge.
>>
>>If that is such an advantage, why hasn't anyone designed lenses for 24x36
>>that
>>cover a much larger area than the film frame?  The same logic would apply.
>>
>
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
>


_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp