ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT:X-ray fogging



Johnny writes:

> Here are the possibilities as I see them.
>
> 1. You are right. There is no substantive
> difference between commercial film processors
> anywhere in the world. Everyone who uses
> custom labs is wasting their money.

This is generally true, at least with respect to ordinary C-41 and E-6
development.  If anyone disagrees, perhaps he can point me to some examples that
show an obvious difference between one lab and another.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.