ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: My 8000 does NOT band...re



> In a message dated 9/2/2001 10:19:26 PM EST, wincros@earthlink.net writes:
> 
>> Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid
>>  implementation I don't think that the three row CCD idea is something
>>  that does not work in practice. It may or may not depending on how it
>>  is implemented.
> 
> Exactly - it's either an implementation flaw in the NikonScan software
> or (more likely) in the scanner firmware, or a scanner hardware design
> flaw.
> 
> Regards,
> Ed Hamrick
> 

So what's the verdict on this?

Do both the Vuescan one row CCD scan and the NikonScan Fine scan produce a
lower quality scan than the three row CCD scan?

-- 

Regards

Richard

//////////////
 | @ @ ------->>> Richard <soho@eircom.net>
  C _) )           
   --- '           
 __ /




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.