ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: Too picky?



At 3:04 AM -0700 8/30/01, Arthur Entlich wrote:
>For people who do NOT have Minolta Dual Dimage II scanners, do you have
>one or more lazy or bad sensors in your CCD array, and if so, do you
>consider that an acceptable defect and have you decided not to exchange
>it?
>
>Has anyone noted this problem of bad sensors in other than Minolta
>scanners?  What about with 4000 dpi models?

        Never had any bad sensors in my Canon FS2710 (nor for that 
matter in my Minolta Scan Dual II, but I may just be lucky <g>).
        I would consider it a completely unacceptable defect.

Regards,
Roger Smith




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.