ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Best digital archive medium for scans?



----- Original Message -----
From: "Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)" <caryenochr@enochsvision.com>
>
> Have you actually worked with a Nikon LS-4000? It's a very fine piece of
> machinery that is easily worth its price. I definitely wouldn't buy on the
> basis of their name as I've had beefs with Nikon in the past. A few years
> ago I ditched my Nikon cameras and lenses and replaced them with a couple
> of Canon EOS1n's and Canon lenses and never looked back. Names don't
> impress me. Only performance matters. I've never seen a single post on
this

I haven't used it yet, but will get my hands on one soon, since a friend of
mine bought one.
I don't think the issue to me is that it is not a good scanner, but whether
it is worth paying almost double to some very capable machines that the
competition is offering.

Regards
Thys



---------------------------------------------------------
         Thys van der Merwe
Portfolio of African Images:
http://home.mweb.co.za/te/teknovis
-----------------------------------------------------------




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.