ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Silverfast vs Nikon Software?



Since you're asking about SilverFast, I assume you've already made up your
mind that you want it and are looking for validation that you've made the
right decision.  OK, "Buy it, you'll love it!"  I think you'll enjoy its
features and its flexibility, such as letting you do a raw scan with Ai and
come back later to process the image with HDR.

Keep in mind though that, not only is it much more expensive than something
like Vuescan, but you'll be paying for upgrades forever.  Vuescan gives you
free upgrades for life and for any scanner you happen to own now or later.  
SilverFast charges for upgrades for each scanner.  They also charge a
separate upgrade price for HDR and Ai, even though the programming code is
virtually identical between the two.  

SilverFast is probably the most powerful piece of scanner software available
and it's nearly as hard to learn to use as it is to learn Photoshop.  Their
documentation absolutely sucks, but that's the norm for all scanner software
documentation.  Things should be much better now that SilverFast has started
a forum where you should be able to get answers to your questions from other
users who have figured out how to use the feature you are asking about.  

Make sure you get the 5.5 upgrade version, especially if you be working with
negatives.  The NegaFix addition has film profiles that's supposed to make
things easier for you.  I haven't tried it yet (see my last paragraph for
why).

SilverFast is having a lot of trouble right now with the launch of the 5.5
upgrade.  Bad serial numbers were issued, and that sort of thing.  They
aren't answering their e-mail very quickly at this time, but I was able to
get "service with a smile" when I called their (toll) phone number.  I expect
they'll have those problems taken care of very soon.

A good reason for using SilverFast, and the reason I use it, is because it
offers IT8 calibration (normally and extra cost option, of course).  I, and
at least one other person, have had serious trouble getting the IT8
calibration software to work.  It told us that we hadn't properly framed the
IT8 target slide in the preview screen, even though we had.  For me, the
problem resolved itself when I upgraded to 5.5.  

My problem right now is that using SilverFast to scan a slide from a medium
format scanner gives a Photoshop error.  The SilverFast people says its a
memory problem and I have to reinstall Photoshop.  That also means I have to
reinstall all of SilverFast, reinstall 5 other Photoshop plug-ins, do an IT8
calibration on three scanners, etc.  Don't know if this is actually related
to SilverFast in any way, but I sure have the urge to blame someone.  (It's
probably Bill Gates' fault.)  Anyway, you should hope for a smooth SilverFast
installation, but be prepared for some bumps along the way.

In a message dated 8/12/2001 4:36:03 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
rlb@triad.rr.com writes:


I have been communicating with the makers of Silverfast software regarding
their issue for the Nikon 8000 scanner. They project it to be ready soon.  I
have never used Silverfast but friends that do highly recommend it.

I would appreciate some thoughts from those that use Silverfast.

Thanks,
Bob Bedwell




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.