ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: (anti)compression?



Rob wrote:

>Lynn wrote:
> > "Compression" starts breaking down when: 1)there is too much texture, or 
>2)colors are "flat" but not quite the same.
>
>And "texture" may be in the form of grain or apparent grain.

Oh, most definitely!!

>My scans of Fuji 800 compress really poorly, while Provia 100F scans 
> >compress far better.  Compression generally works well if there is 
> >little variation in the pixels; no grain means good compression and 
> >coarse grain means poor compression.

Quite right. I have a picture of a shaggy Siberian tiger that is a total 
nightmare--there is grain, grain aliasing, and a *wealth* of original 
texture that leaves almost no two pixels the same. It may be worth 
mentioning that a forced, or "lossy" compression will also beat the hell out 
of the picture detail. I could go back and reshoot him, but I think he died 
a few years ago. :-)

Best regards--LRA





_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.