Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows

Yes, so I have been told.  I stand corrected and less ignorant than I was
prior to having the meaning of system resources explained.  I do appreciate
everyone's patience with me and helpful explanations,  Despite my wrongfully
using the wrong indicator, my experiences still remain the same regarding
the Ram over 512 MB being utilized in my system and setup under Win 98.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 9:38 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows

"Tony Sleep" <TonySleep@halftone.co.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500  Laurie Solomon (laurie@advancenet.net)
> wrote:
> >  I noticed in both systems that since
> > the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows
> > less system resources being used than previously (ie., more system's
> > resources available), which is one thing which I take as an indication
> > that the additional RAM above 512 is being taken into account.
> AIUI Resources meter shows only useage of 3 internal OS stacks which are
> fixed size (System, User, GDI) and don't vary with RAM installed.

Tony is correct.  The system resources have nothing to do with free RAM in
only with available space within the fixed User, System and GDI blocks.



Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.