ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows



"Steve Greenbank" <steve@gccl.fsbusiness.co.uk> wrote:
> Further, in my experience of Win NT 4.0 the claimed reliability of desktop
> PC's is a fallacy. At work I have used around a dozen PC's and all have
been
> much less reliable than my home PCs on Win9x.

Gah.  I use NT 4.0 SP6a on my computer at work and it is *far* more stable
than my home PC which runs Win98SE.

Obscanning - I wonder how many of those using Windows with filmscanners are
running NT or Win2K?

Rob

PS I have upgraded my computer to a Celeron 850 and 512MB RAM from a Celeron
533 with 288MB RAM.  Using Vuescan and PSP is definitely significantly
faster.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.