ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows



I had 512 MB RAM and upgraded to 1GB with Win Me and it didn't work well. It
recognized the 1GB, but I got a lot of crashes.

After I switched to Win 2K, all is well and the 1 GB memory is definitely
helpful in Photoshop even with the 100MB images from 35mm scans. Less
switching to the scratch disk after a lot of history states.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Raphael Bustin
Sent: Thursday, July 26, 2001 7:47 PM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows


At 11:42 AM 7/27/01 +1000, Julian wrote:

>I'd also like to know if it is true as Tony suggests that aver 512MB or RAM
>is a waste, as I was thinking of getting more RAM on the weekend.


Buy it anyway.  It's never been cheaper.  Sooner or
later it'll come in handy.  Maybe use it in another
PC in the meantime.


rafe b.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.