ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows



Fine; but what do you suggest as a way to determine if and how the
additional RAM is being taken into account and used?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
[mailto:owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Tony Sleep
Sent: Friday, July 27, 2001 5:34 AM
To: filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Scanning and memory limits in Windows


On Thu, 26 Jul 2001 13:03:17 -0500  Laurie Solomon (laurie@advancenet.net)
wrote:

>  I noticed in both systems that since
> the addition of the RAM the Windows resources meter shows proportionately
> less system resources being used than previously (ie., more system's
> resources available), which is one thing which I take as an indication
> that
> the additional RAM above 512 is being taken into account.

AIUI Resources meter shows only useage of 3 internal OS stacks which are of
fixed size (System, User, GDI) and don't vary with RAM installed.

Regards

Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio & exhibit; + film scanner info
& comparisons




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.