ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: why not digital minilabs?



Because the transistion from digital image to print is non trivial. It's
similar to the problems of printing negitives.

> Lynn:  I understand that the digital machines will also accept an image
> that is given to them on a disk and that the machine can make the print
> from it. Wouldn't this allow you to controll all but the actual print
> process.  You do do all the adjustments in PS, or other similar program,
> first to get the control.
> 
> Gordon
> 
> Lynn Allen wrote:
> 
> > Steve wrote:
> >
> > *There's* one very good reason for retaining total control--the lab will
> > do the better print for the same price as the bad one, but you pay for
> > both of them.  In your decision, you have to estimate how many of those
> > you're going to have. Good luck. ;-)
> >
> >




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.