Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?



There is no question about it, home filmscanning technology is constantly, I
will say developing but not immature.  Too many bad connotations to use a
word like that.

As far as the comparison with a flatbed scanner, film has much more dynamic
range than does a print - it does not surprise me at all that the flatbed
you mention will pick up everything in the print - there is less to pick up.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tomasz Zakrzewski" <tomzakrz@ka.onet.pl>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:37 AM
Subject: filmscanners: LS-4000ED Dmax 4,2 or rather 2,3?

[snipped]

| Why is it so that I can't buy a flatbed scanner in $ 1000 price range that
| would show no noise in shadows of scans of reflective media (prints) and
| it's impossible to find a well designed film scanner in the $ 2000 price
| range?
| Right now my conclusion is that the home filmscannig technology is still
| immature.
| And the flatbed technology? A huge gap between what's promised and what's
in
| real life.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.