ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings



Depends on the work.  In some image, grain is desirable.   Biggest I've
printed is 36"x 48" - but I am interested in doing some printing with
painted on emulsion.  The biggest 4x5 I've seen enlarged with nary a trace
of grain was about 80"x64"   Sure you can do that with a digital back fo a
4x5, but its a scanning back and it costs over $20k...

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Sunday, June 24, 2001 9:48 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Digital Shortcomings


> >That said, I'm still all in film - because I like enlarging
> >past the point that the D-30 image holds up
>
> What is that point (print size) for your work?
>
>
> --
> Bob Shomler
> http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.