ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: OT: Device recognition, Win 98



On a PC it may be worth trying regedit to fool the software. It should be
noted that regedit can completely screw your machine. Before starting save a
copy!
The relevant part is "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\Enum\SCSI". If someone supplies you
with the relevant information for the scanner your trying to emulate it
might work - it depends how the software is coded.

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard N. Moyer" <dickmoyer@mail.earthlink.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: OT: Device recognition, Win 98


> For Apple only. This type of situation has been rectified sometimes -
> for instance in certain CD machines - by using RESEDIT, and changing
> the ID in the driver. Do you know if this is an ID issue or what?
> Inquiry commands must include some form of ID - - -? No idea what PC
> users can do in a similar way.
> >
> >The Microtek and Polaroid scanners are almost identical, but
> >they return different strings from the scsi inquiry command.
> >This keeps the Polaroid scanners from working with the
> >Microtek software and vice versa.  There's nothing to prevent
> >Polaroid and Microtek from making their software run on
> >each other's scanners, but they haven't done this.
> >
> >Regards,
> >Ed Hamrick
>
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.