Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 




      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: New Nikon performance

I have also used LS2000 with many Kodachromes and have had GREAT success 
with them.  My problem was mould and some quite awful slides have been 
rescued with minimal work.  I tried one of them before getting the Nikon 
and spent 3 hours (it was a very bad attack of mould) fixing it in PS.  The 
Nikon scan, with a couple of minutes of work, was far superior.

But I realise that maybe it depends on which version of Kodachrome you 
have. Maybe I won't be so successful when I get to the '80's.


At 04:12 09/06/01, Dave wrote:
>But I have a
>lot of Kodachromes I'm waiting to scan and I'd like to get an idea if
>the new Nikons are going to sneak in some problems here or not.  Dane
>reports no problems at all with thousands of Kodachromes scanned on an
>LS-2000, and I wonder what I'm doing wrong.

Julian Robinson
in usually sunny, smog free Canberra, Australia


Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.