ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: The whole frame



Peter wrote:
> Fair question Rob -- the amount lost is small of course.
> But I like to assemble the elements of the picture within
> the whole frame before the exposure, and I like the
> evidence of that to show in the print.

Fair enough.  I confess I've never done a test to find out exactly what
the comparison is between what appears in my camera's viewfinder and what
appears no the film.  I try not to crop too tight in the viewfinder just
in case.  Maybe it's a reasonable assumption to think that the edge of the
viewfinder is actually the edge of what goes on the film, but I'm not certain
of it, so I don't take the risk.  But having taken photos the way you did,
I can see why you would want to scan the entirety of the image out to the
border.

Rob


Rob Geraghty harper@wordweb.com
http://wordweb.com






 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.