Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
Vai jus esat latvietis?
Karlis Schulmeisters
----- Original Message -----
From: "Maris V. Lidaka, Sr." <mlidaka@ameritech.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 6:28 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
> And, of course, the color gamut of film is greater than that of print.
>
> Maris
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com>
> To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
> Sent: Friday, May 18, 2001 5:42 PM
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Filmscanning vs. Flatbedding
>
>
> | >There is no doubt in my mind that scanning the negative is far better
> | >than scanning the print.
> |
> | My list of some reasons to scan from negative rather than print,
> | accumulated over three years of neg scan experience (and with a
> | lot of jump-start knowledge from others on the filmscanners list):
>
> [snipped]
>
|
