ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any easy solution ?



My experience as well.  The lenses Kodak provides for their projectors 
are very "forgiving" should we say.

My Navitar Gold lenses certainly "define" what I'm looking at.

Art

John Matturri wrote:


> 
> Haven't been following this thread all that closely so this may have
> been covered. But what lens are you using for your projections? If it is
> a lens supplied with most projectors the poor quality might be a masking
> factor. The difference between one of these lenses and a Buhl or similar
> projection lens is pretty substantial.





 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.