Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: Re: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2001 20:00:51 +1000
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <NBBBKPAGMKMAMBDNLDGOAELEFNAA.michael@shaffer.net> <003c01c0da5c$982609d0$cc4285ce@m5>

"Edwin Eleazer" <ee907@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Version 3.1 of NikonScan will be out in the next week

Hmm... I wonder if this might include some attempt at fixing the jaggies
problem?

Rob

References:
- RE: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
  - From: "shAf" <michael@shaffer.net>
- Re: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
  - From: "Edwin Eleazer" <ee907@earthlink.net>

Prev by Date: Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any easy solution ?
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: What causes this and is there any easy solution ?
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: LS-2000 VS LS-40
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread