Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED review part II
Todd must have scanned at 48bits to get that size file...PS 6.0 will work
with "major" functions at 16 bits/channel...I get the same approximate file
size with my Microtek Artixscan 4000T with VUESCAN at full-tilt...
Eddie Wiseman
----- Original Message -----
From: "tflash" <tflash@earthlink.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 10:52 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED review part II
> > when it comes to dealing with the files it
> > can generate (122+Mb files from a 35mm frame) Photoshop does a better
> > job.
>
> I am enjoying your review, but how does 4000ppi @ 35mm come out to an
122+Mb
> file?
>
> Todd
>
|
