ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: ColorCorrectionLink



The gamut warning would be meaningful - it advises that you have a choice to
make concerning rendering intent.  The crux IMHO is deciding whether the
particular saturation of the out-of-gamut colors and those in gamut is more
important than  the "overall relationship between colors". The best example
Bruce provides is the figure 7 series where "the colorimetric rendering
preserves more of the saturation in the water".

And certainly, you could convert by each method and use trial-and-error to
decide.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alan Womack" <arwbackup@worldnet.att.net>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 2:56 PM
Subject: re: filmscanners: ColorCorrectionLink


| My take on the choice would be how much of your image is out of the gamut
of
| the output device?  A gamut warning inside Adobe RGB would be meaningless
| right?
|
| So do you convert each to the printer space by two different methods and
see
| which is better via printing or ??
|
|   >>  When reprofiling, use the 'perceptual intent' rendering method
except
| when
|   >>  one of the other choices works better. In which case use that.




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.