ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Printdpi



Tony:  I am also concerned that the final stage is really broken.  I have seen 
the
Epson prints that the company uses and they look great, of course.  When I 
finally
get my scan to look the way I want it to look in PS, the print may come close 
but
not close enough.  If there is a chink in the digital process, I believe that 
it is
in the part of the work flow that deals with the transfer of the image to the
printer.  I bought an Epson Stylus Photo 700 about 2.5 years ago and it 
constantly
changes its values, especially when I get a new cartridge and then has to get  
into
the mood to do it right.  Like you, I am frustrated by it, and I do not depend 
on
it for a living.

I am getting to the point that I will be taking my disk to my friendly 
Noritsu/Fuji
printer lab.  Hopefully we we can come up with the adjustments needed to get the
print to match the disk image as I see it on my screen.

Tony Sleep wrote:

> On 30 Mar 2001 10:43:35 EST  Richard Starr (Richard.Starr@valley.net) wrote:
>
>
> What is so galling is that having spent ages getting a scan 'just right' on
> screen, and all the ICM stuff sussed, this final stage is really broken.
>




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.