There is a review of 3 dual-monitor video cards at
I have just barely started reading it so I don't know how valuable it is.
Maris
----- Original Message -----
From: "Colin Maddock" <cmaddock@clear.net.nz>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2001 2:09 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: GeForce2 MX Graphics Card
| I wrote:
| >>A friend here also suggested looking at a Riva TNT2-M64 32MB,
| >>but I believe they are "last year's" technology? ;-)
|
| Rob replied:
| >I think that is the chipset on my video card. Whether it's too old
depends
| >on whether you want to play next year's computer games.
|
| Which I don't.
|
| >I'm certain that different cards will give a different
| >quality of display at a given resolution - especially at really high
resolutions.
| >I don't have the means to do a side-by-side comparison, but I'm sure that
| >it's true. Sadly, none of the reviews I've ever seen in magazines make
| >much point of the clarity of display when comparing different cards
connected
| >to the same monitor.
|
| The only comment I have seen regarding that was on Tom's Hardware site,
when the Matrox G450 was referred to as having "razor sharp signal quality",
but no comparisons were made.
|
| Colin Maddock
|
|
|
|
