ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Re: GeForce2 MX Graphics Card



I wrote:
>>A friend here also suggested looking at a Riva TNT2-M64 32MB,
>>but I believe they are "last year's" technology? ;-)

Rob replied:
>I think that is the chipset on my video card.  Whether it's too old depends
>on whether you want to play next year's computer games. 

Which I don't.

>I'm certain that different cards will give a different
>quality of display at a given resolution - especially at really high 
>resolutions.
>I don't have the means to do a side-by-side comparison, but I'm sure that
>it's true.  Sadly, none of the reviews I've ever seen in magazines make
>much point of the clarity of display when comparing different cards connected
>to the same monitor.

The only comment I have seen regarding that was on Tom's Hardware site, when 
the Matrox G450 was referred to as having "razor sharp signal quality", but no 
comparisons were made.

Colin Maddock







 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.