ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution




>
> > The right tools for the job.  Having a 'resolution' of at least
> 1280x1024 is
> > not untypical for most people who do image editing.  In fact,
> I'd bet most
> > on this list have 1600 x 1200.
> >
>   I'd bet you are wrong. Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
> which is the sweet spot in the pricing structure right now, and although
> people doing scanning "might" push that number a bit,

How much would you be willing to bet?  "Most people" is distinctly different
than "most people who have filmscanners", which is what this mailing list is
about.

How many people on this list do you think use PhotoShop?  I believe PS has a
higher user interface requirements than the scanner driver, which was the
origin of this discussion (scanner driver screen space requirements).




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.