ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements



Something in the nature of clean light, medium, and heavy perhaps?

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com>
To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2001 8:51 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements


| >> I though Ed made the point: "clean" would NOT soften the image except
| >> in the regions where dust was removed, BUT that softening kicks in for
| >> "scrub" & "scour" because of his grain removal algorithm is used(?)
| >...
| >I think many on the list would vote for a separate checkbox control to
| >enable grain removal independently of the clean/scrub/scour setting.
|
| That would be best; but if not that, at least change the terms in the
Clean option selection set to more accurately reflect what they cause
vuescan to do now (the terms Scrub and Scour seem to have little relation to
the grain removal process that is performed in the current release).
|
| --
| Bob Shomler
| http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm
|




 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.