Lexa Software: Filmscanners@halftone.co.uk archive

		Apache-Talk @lexa.ru
		Inet-Admins @info.east.ru
		Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk
		Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru
		nginx-ru @sysoev.ru

СТАТЬИ

ПЕРСОНАЛЬНОЕ

ПРОГРАММЫ

ПИШИТЕ
ПИСЬМА

АРХИВ :: Filmscanners

Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan

To: <filmscanners@halftone.co.uk>
Subject: Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
From: "Rob Geraghty" <harper@wordweb.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 08:43:11 +1000
List-help: <mailto:majordomo@lists.cix.co.uk> 'help' as msg. text
Mailing-list: filmscanners; contact: owner-filmscanners@halftone.co.uk
References: <3.0.6.32.20010216192621.008053b0@pop.pl.camtech.net.au> <3.0.3.32.20010216072536.006c66a8@pop.slip.net>

"Bob Shomler" <bob@shomler.com> wrote:
> One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5
> (or some release before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was
added to vuescan).

I still have several versions prior to 6.6. I'll see if I can give it a go.

Rob

References:
- RE: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
  - From: markthom@camtech.net.au
- Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
  - From: Bob Shomler <bob@shomler.com>

Prev by Date: RE: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
Next by Date: Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
Previous by thread: Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
Next by thread: Re: filmscanners: GEM, ROC compared to Vuescan
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread