ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá














     áòèé÷ :: Security-alerts
Security-Alerts mailing list archive (security-alerts@yandex-team.ru)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[security-alerts] FW: EEYE: Temporary workaround for IE createTextRange vulnerability



þÉÔÁÊÔÅ ÄÏ ËÏÎÃÁ - ÔÁÍ Ä×Á ÐÉÓØÍÁ. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marc Maiffret [mailto:mmaiffret@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 4:44 AM
> To: Patch Management Mailing List
> Subject: EEYE: Temporary workaround for IE createTextRange 
> vulnerability
> 
> eEye Digital Security has created a temporary work around for the
> current Internet Explorer zero day vulnerability within the IE
> createTextRange functionality. 
> 
> This workaround has been created because currently there is 
> no solution
> from Microsoft other than the workaround to disable Active 
> Scripting. We
> have personally had requests from various customers and the 
> community to
> help provide a free solution in the case that companies and users are
> not able to disable Active Scripting. The workaround we have created,
> like ones before it, is experimental in a sense and should only be
> installed if you are not able to use the safer mitigation of disabling
> Active Scripting. 
> 
> The workaround is obviously free, and we do not require any 
> registration
> information to download it from the eEye website. 
> 
> Should you encounter any problems with the workaround or bugs please
> send email to alerts@xxxxxxxx with detailed information on the problem
> you experienced and we will work to fix any bugs in a timely 
> fashion. We
> will post updates to the website with version numbers and bug fixes
> should they arise.
> 
> Obviously these things are experimental in nature but considering the
> options of being vulnerable or at least having a fighting 
> chance... Well
> I think you get the point. Again this is just another 
> mitigation option
> until Microsoft releases their patch, which last was 
> scheduled for April
> 11th or 16 days from now. 
> 
> For more information on the vulnerability and a link to download the
> workaround please visit:
> http://www.eeye.com/html/research/alerts/AL20060324.html
> 
> Signed,
> Marc Maiffret
> Chief Hacking Officer
> eEye Digital Security
> T.949.349.9062
> F.949.349.9329
> http://eEye.com/Blink - End-Point Vulnerability Prevention
> http://eEye.com/Retina - Network Security Scanner
> http://eEye.com/Iris - Network Traffic Analyzer
> http://eEye.com/SecureIIS - Stop known and unknown IIS 
> vulnerabilities 
> 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Derek Soeder [mailto:dsoeder@xxxxxxxx] 
> Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 7:56 AM
> To: Patch Management Mailing List
> Subject: RE: EEYE: Temporary workaround for IE 
> createTextRange vulnerability
> 
> We've had some questions about how the patch works, so here's an
> overview.  PM is a smart crowd and some of y'all might need 
> this info or
> might just be curious.
> 
> 
> Once you start installing the patch, the first thing that happens is
> that the installer copies the JSCRIPT.DLL already existing on 
> the system
> to "%SystemRoot%\system32\jscript-eeye-patch20.dll".  Next, it locates
> and patches the vulnerable code inside 
> jscript-eeye-patch20.dll, using a
> generic technique that finds the vulnerability on every system we've
> tested (a LOT).  This allows the patch to be applied on all affected
> OSes, Service Packs, IE versions, and languages.
> 
> So, to emphasize, the original JSCRIPT.DLL is never modified.  But how
> do we get Windows to use our patched version instead?
> 
> There are three places in the registry where JSCRIPT.DLL is registered
> as a COM server -- the following three class IDs under
> "HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Classes\CLSID":
> 
>     {f414c260-6ac0-11cf-b6d1-00aa00bbbb58}
>     {f414c261-6ac0-11cf-b6d1-00aa00bbbb58}
>     {f414c262-6ac0-11cf-b6d1-00aa00bbbb58}
> 
> Once jscript-eeye-patch20.dll has been successfully created 
> and patched,
> the installer modifies the default value of the 
> "InprocServer32" subkey
> under each of these CLSIDs to refer to the patched DLL instead of
> JSCRIPT.DLL.  This change won't affect any already-open Internet
> Explorer windows, or any other process with JSCRIPT.DLL 
> already loaded,
> so they're still vulnerable while running, but will cause new 
> processes
> to use jscript-eeye-patch20.dll and therefore be immune.
> 
> Of course, the installer preserves the old values, and will 
> replace them
> when the patch is uninstalled.  But as long as these registry 
> values are
> set, jscript-eeye-patch20.dll will basically eclipse the Microsoft
> JSCRIPT.DLL on the system, so once that hotfix finally comes out, any
> changes it makes to JSCRIPT.DLL will be ineffective as long 
> as the eEye
> patch remains installed.  This is important because history strongly
> suggests that the MS hotfix will silently fix other unrelated
> vulnerabilities as well as the createTextRange bug.
> 
> To remedy this, the installer places an "eEye JScript Patch 
> Checker" in
> All Users' Startup folder, that checks the file dates on 
> MSHTML.DLL and
> JSCRIPT.DLL to see if they're replaced by more modern 
> versions.  Part of
> the problem with the official patch not being available yet 
> (besides the
> obvious) is that we don't know for certain which files Microsoft will
> update, or what their dates or versions will be.  Unfortunately, this
> part involves a bit of guesswork, so we use the date that the first IE
> zero-day appeared (March 16th) as the cutoff -- if either DLL 
> we inspect
> has a date later than that, then the checker will begin 
> asking the user
> if he'd/she'd like to uninstall the patch.
> 
> Here's the message box text:
> 
>     "This system appears to have the official Microsoft hotfix for the
>     Internet Explorer createTextRange() vulnerability 
> installed.  If the
>     hotfix is not installed, or if you are uncertain, please select No
> and
>     ask your system administrator or computer support staff for
> assistance.
> 
>     "Would you like to uninstall the eEye Digital Security 
> JScript patch
> now?"
> 
> Rather than relying on the checker, though, to detect the presence of
> the Microsoft hotfix, please uninstall the eEye patch *before*
> installing the hotfix!  That's the only way to ensure that you don't
> experience any conflicts like a new MSHTML.DLL trying to talk to the
> older-model jscript-eeye-patch20.dll.  Hopefully there will be no such
> conflicts, but until the hotfix is released it's impossible to say for
> sure.
> 
> 
> I hope this helps you all better understand our patch and determine if
> it's right for your systems.  Please e-mail alerts@xxxxxxxx 
> if you have
> any questions.  Be safe...
> 
> -- Derek
> 
> 



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.