ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 


  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: nginx-ru
Nginx-ru mailing list archive (nginx-ru@sysoev.ru)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: recursive_error_pages limited to a chain of 11?


  • To: nginx-ru@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: recursive_error_pages limited to a chain of 11?
  • From: "o456092@xxxxxxxxx" <nginx-forum@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2012 10:57:23 -0400
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tigger.jlkhosting.com; s=x; h=Date:Sender:From:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To; bh=mYn8+WYVsB6ob4Vq2KXpskJqYWBmdPG/Qg1SW1kxQzk=; b=cPf9Z7wM+Yc/StK3tQW4upkE0eZAZQIQlxJ3iQNLpE/JcFD+dX1g+QjlZzR0TYml2IF93Aqp1o81tx3hYSnaj65R6UGDphbS7cEwwoYRNqLT/FGvgiIPvI0Cw0uGXmCl;
  • In-reply-to: <20120925142742.GT40452@mdounin.ru>
  • References: <20120925142742.GT40452@mdounin.ru>

Hi Maxim,

   Thanks for pointing  this out.

   You mentioned using: proxy_next_upstream, rather than my current strategy
- would you happen to know if this has any limitations?  Will this serve the
same purpose as the current configuration that I have?  Would it perform,
better, worse, or the same?

   Thank you,

   James.

Posted at Nginx Forum: 
http://forum.nginx.org/read.php?21,231038,231046#msg-231046

_______________________________________________
nginx-ru mailing list
nginx-ru@xxxxxxxxx
http://mailman.nginx.org/mailman/listinfo/nginx-ru


 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.