ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Inet-Admins
Inet-Admins mailing list archive (inet-admins@info.east.ru)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [inet-admins] Fw: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking



Fri, Jun 26, 1998 at 02:12:21AM +0400, Ilya Shulman wrote:
> Ë ×ÏÐÒÏÓÕ Ï transparent cache ;)
õÒÁ!;)
á × ÄÉÇÉËÅÛ ÎÁÄÏ SSLÅÍ ÈÏÄÉÔØ ;)
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jon Lewis <jlewis@inorganic5.fdt.net>
> To: nanog@merit.edu <nanog@merit.edu>
> Subject: backbone transparent proxy / connection hijacking
> 
> 
> >Has anyone else noticed Digex playing with transparent proxying on their
> >backbone?  We have one of our T1's through them, and found that all web
> >traffic going out our Digex connection goes through a proxy.  We've got
> >customers with web sites that are broken now because they can't
> >communicate with things like Cybercash, because their outgoing http
> >requests are hijacked and sent through a Digex web cache. 
> >
> >Digex wants us to register each web server out on the rest of the
> >internet that hosts from our network need to talk directly to.  This looks
> >like the beginning of a big PITA.
> >
> >I wouldn't have a problem with Digex setting up some web caches and
> >encouraging customers to setup their own caches and have them talk to the
> >Digex ones via ICP...but caching everything without our knowledge/consent
> >stinks.
   ^^^^^^ ;)
-- 
Alex Lyamin
=============================================================================
"inet-admins" Internet access mailing list. Maintained by East Connection ISP.
Mail "unsubscribe inet-admins" to Majordomo@info.east.ru if you want to quit.



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.