ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Modern photography...



Arthur Entlich wrote:

> OK, how about this... maybe the PEC is responsible ;-)

I've never owned any, it's available but hard to find in UK. I've seldom
used anything other than a dry brush for dust, very occasionally a
microfibre cloth. I have some proprietary film cleaner which was reckoned
to be the best available before PEC12, but avoid it if possible as it
leaves a slightly smeary residue. It's only worth using for fingerprints
IME, and they're very rare.

> What is that stuff really made from anyway?

Probably mainly carbon tetrachloride, which is carcinogenic - at least
that's what the stuff I have includes.

Regards

Tony Sleep - http://www.halftone.co.uk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.