ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Compact Cameras



My brother has the old XA, for many years now, and the Canon 350D, at about
30 oz with lens, must be about 4x the mass, and it isn't going to fit in
anybody's shirt pocket.

Berry



On 4/25/05 7:34 AM, "Al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk"
<Al@greenspace.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:

>
>
>
> David J. Littleboy wrote
>
>> The small-sensor cameras have been getting _worse_ as they pack more and
>> more pixels into smaller and smaller sensors. Things like the Sony S85 or
>> Canon G3 used to be pretty decent at ISO 100. Recent cameras tend to be
>> noisier at ISO 50 than the S85/G3 were at ISO 100. (One exception: the Canon
>> G5 was a real dog, but the G6 is quite a bit better.)
>
> Even though you feel that the G6 is an improvement over the G5, do you still
> consider it to be too noisy at ISO50 or ISO100?  I'm curious as the S70 shares
> the same sensor as the G6.
>
> As I generally use IS0100 slide film, I could live without using the higher
> ISOs.
>
>> The new Canon 350D with, say, the 24/2.8 (functions like a 38mm lens) would
>> give the XA a run for the money (and kill the XA at ISO 800 or 1600) and not
>> be a lot larger. (The 350D + 24/2.8 weighs 590 + 270 or so grams.)
>>
>
> I can see a lot of merit in this setup but the Olympus XA is a very compact
> shirt-pocket sized camera.  I know the 350D is small but it's not quite that
> small!
>
> It looks as though it will be a while yet before compact digicams of the size
> I want can start to compare to their DSLR siblings, at least in terms of noise
> and ISO flexibility.
>
> Ironically, my scanner (Minolta Scan Elite) is relatively old and, even with
> multi-pass scanning, there is some noise in the very deep shadows.  As such,
> it is the weak link in the chain but I don't really want to buy a new scanner.
> I'd rather put the cash towards my first forray into the world of digicams!
>
> Thanks to you (and everyone else) for your comments.
>
>
>
> Al Bond
>
> --
>
> Whatever you Wanadoo:
> http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/time/
>
> This email has been checked for most known viruses - find out more at:
> http://www.wanadoo.co.uk/help/id/7098.htm
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ----------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
> body


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.