ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Software dust removal



>Dieder--
>Have you tried the same experiment with Digital ICE set in the "Normal"
>setting rather than "Fine"? I find virtually no image information when I
>do a difference between a "No Digital ICE" scan and a "Normal Digital ICE"
>scan.

Normal or Fine can be used and again using the photoshop layers method
(exclusion/difference) you can see the differences between the ICE'd version
and the 'raw' version. From my experience, ICE softens details. Not enough to
make me stop using it on a daily basis, but enough that if I have a
neg/tranny that I want to enlarge, I will do a raw scan and do the rest
myself.

Dieder

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.