ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Lousy results with Nikon LS-2000 & Kodak Gold200?



It does appear that some films don't get along with certain scanners, or
at least certain native optical resolutions of some scanners.

To the person who first brought up this thread, have you tried both with
and without dICE?  If it is particularly bad under dICE scans there
might be residual silver in the film that wasn't properly bleached or
fixed out of it.  Try a scan without dICE on, and see if the results are
different at all.

Art

Clark Guy wrote:

> HI, all!
>
> Could this be grain aliasing?   I've had similar results scanning Tri-X 35mm
> film on my Scan Multi II (2800 DPI).  Examination of negatives under an
> optical microscope shows the actual grain to be much smaller than it appears
> on the scans.
>
> Guy
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Julian Vrieslander [mailto:julianv@mindspring.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:35 PM
> To: Clark Guy
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Lousy results with Nikon LS-2000 & Kodak
> Gold200?
>
>
> On 9/30/04 11:32 AM, "Dieder Bylsma" <scanners@spacemoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Anybody else get tremendously lousy results scanning Kodak Gold 200
>
> (current
>
>>stock) with the LS-2000? Tremendous noise in well exposed pics. Rather
>>appalling actually. Enough to make me question the scanner or the film.
>
> I'd
>
>>prefer the source of the problem to be the film so... is there film that
>
> just
>
>>scans like crud on LED-illuminated scanners such as the Nikon LS series?
>
>
> I have also had very disappointing results when scannng Gold 200 on an
> LS-4000.  To me, it looks like film grain rather than noise from the
> scanner.  I don't see nearly as much of it when I scan Portra (160 ISO, if I
> remember right).
>
> --
> Julian Vrieslander <julianv@mindspring.com>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ------------
> Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
> filmscanners'
> or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title
> or body
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.