ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Nikon Scanners



Frank Mullins wrote:
> ..., my slide collection consists of over 10,000 slides. While
> I am
> sure I will choose not to digitize all of them, a bulk loader is a
> major
> consideration. Thanks, for bringing this to my attention. To scan
> these one
> at a time would take hundreds, if not thousands, of hours. I assume
> the bulk
> loaders readily handle standard slide mounts. Probably 90% of my
> slides are
> in the older standard Kodak cardboard mounts. The more recent ones
> are the
> Kodak plastic mounts so I hope they would not present a problem.

I have read several reports from people who have used older models of Nikon
slide feeders. As I recall, they found the feeders were very reliable with
plastic slide mounts.

With card mounts there was a risk that the feeder would try to gobble two slides
at the same time, causing a jam. This was easily averted by reducing the size of
an input slot (with, for example, a piece of credit card held on with adhesive
tape).

Does this apply to the current model, does anyone know?

Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.