ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] film vs digital test



I am in the midst of doing a basic comparison between my Hasselblad and the
new Kodak SLR Pro (14mb, full frame). I don't need a super accurate test,
just reasonably fair. My work is half color, half b&w with the end product
in books and large exhibition prints 20 to 40".

I invite suggestions and/or critiques of my approach as outlined here:

I gave up the dark room several years ago after too many decades. So I must
compare scanned film against digital RAW. Also, though it may invite scorn
from some purists, I am comparing the actual tools I work with most of the
time, not the ultimate options in lenses. These are:
Hblad 203fe with 60-120 zoom
Kodak SLRpro with Tamron 28-300.

I take the test images from the same position and adjust the Tamron zoom
factor to match the approximate vertical coverage of Hblad zoom. To avoid
any focus hocus pocus I am measuring distances. I care mainly about the
clarity issue --ie details and sharpness and less about color accuracy as
this is more easily adjusted.

The digital raw is 16 bit, 4500x3000 @ 300 rez which equals about 10" ht image.

The 220 films, (CN400) and Ektachrome VS 120 are scanned on a Minolta
MultiPro (a Nikon 8000 is also available). But here is where I need some
advice. I believe I should scan to end up with the same 300 rez but to what
file size?
Here are two I have tried and the thinking behind each:

1. Scan the 2.10 x 2.10 area at maximum of 4800 dpi which gives an image
size of 34" sq and a file size of 604 mb which is simply too unwieldy.

2. Scan at the nearest even dpi to approximately double the image size
since the 220 film is a little over 2x the ht of the Kodak orig of 1" which
means 3200 dpi and image size 22.7, file size 268.

I stand ready for any further ideas. At the end, if any one is interested,
I shall try to post the results on my web site, normancarver.com

Thanks for any help, Norm Carver

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.