ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: another Sharpening question



Well, I did answer it ;-)

And basically, I said the same thing, just in a LOT more words... now
THAT's a slight reversal of roles ;-)

Art

Laurie Solomon wrote:

> I am not sure that that is an answerable question without actually seeing
> the various images.
>
> filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I am seeking an opinion about the purpose for sharpening a certain
>>type of image.  I have a large batch of unsharpened scans of various
>>cloud forms and skies. In most cases ground detail is minimal or
>>dark.  Do you think there is any merit to doing any sharpening to
>>this kind of subject matter?  (Please say no - it would make life
>>much easier!)
>>
>>Ed Verkaik
>>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.