ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Better DOF than Nikon?



Keep in mind that heated slides will tend to pop, and the ones you have
will be even worse.  I'd try to go with a cool illumination source if
possible.

Art

Paul D. DeRocco wrote:

>>From: Peter Marquis-Kyle
>>
>>You might consider using a Canon FD Auto Bellows with the slide
>>duplicator accessory and, say, a 50mm macro lens. This would make the
>>business of framing, magnification and focus straightforward.
>>
>>(If you were in Australia I'd lend this gear to you...)
>>
>>You'd need the FD-EOS Macro Lens Mount Converter to attach your 10D,
>>and probably a strobe for illumination.
>>
>>Something to consider...
>
>
> Hmmmm. I just asked about this in the Canon 10D list, so it's serendipitous
> that you'd suggest this here.
>
> So this is all stuff that Canon makes? Could this work with the regular 50mm
> f1.8 lens? It focuses down to 450mm, while the macro lens focuses to 230mm.
>
> As to illumination, I was thinking of yanking the lens out of my projector,
> and pointing the camera into the hole, stopping way down for the DOF. It
> might require a ND filter if the light's too bright. That would make it
> really easy to step through a bunch of slides.
>
> --
>
> Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
> Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
>
>

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.