ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: Better DOF than Nikon?



Hi Paul

          How many slides are you talking about?.   Tens, hundreds or a
thousand?.

          Another alternative would be to "copy" them using the old
camera-bellows-slide holder system.    Then scan the copies.

         This however would introduce another source of error/distortion/grain
etc of the image.     Unless of course you have enough slides and you seem to
be in the buying mood, you could use it as the excuse to buy a decent digital
camera so you could "digitize" the damaged slides in one step using the
bellows etc.

        I have not tried it, but imagine the DOF of a stopped down regular
50mm lens would be significantly better than of a film scanner.

        My $.02.

        Best,  Alex

On Thursday 15 January 2004 21:07, Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
> > From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> >
> >            Been thinking of your warped slides.
> >
> >            If you got some slide mounts with glass, but instead
> > of mounting
> > them normally with the slide film between the two pieces of
> > glass, you mount
> > them with both the glasses on the "outer" side of the warped film.
> >
> >           This way the glass would flatten the negative to
> > perhaps where the
> > DOF of the scanner is sufficient.
> >
> >           I don't have any of the mounts around to try it.   I do
> > not know if
> > you would get too many Newton rings etc.     Diffraction?.
> >
> >           Might be worth a try.
>
> Actually, I did that a couple days ago. I took one of my anti-Newton glass
> mounts, and yanked out the glass on the emulsion side. It worked fairly
> well, although I have some slides that, as a result of a fire, have such
> horrible ripples in them that they won't even lie flat when sandwiched
> between two pieces of glass.
>
> Besides, it's such a pain to do that, that I'd gladly buy a different
> scanner if it would solve the problem.
>
> Anyway, thanks for the input.
>
> --
>
> Ciao,               Paul D. DeRocco
> Paul                mailto:pderocco@ix.netcom.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>------------- Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with
> 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as
> appropriate) in the message title or body

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.