ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: NikonScan problem



Kodachrome is a quirky little beast to deal with, especially with Nikonscan.
In fact for that reason alone do I end up using Vuescan for doing large
quantities of Kodachrome. Otherwise it's just too frustrating to fight with
Nikonscan.

As to your test results, yes, I've seen that with NikonScan before with the
LS-2000, the LS-4000. I wonder how the LS-5000 will portray Nikonscan.

NScan 3.x has a 'Kodachrome' film type. What happens if you fiddle with that?
Likewise, what happens if you A:B the "Processed" vs "Natural" tabs?



Dieder

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.