ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: 10D Tony shots


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] RE: 10D Tony shots
  • From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <Ramesh.Nagaraj@ca.com>
  • Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 20:59:40 -0400
  • Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
  • Thread-index: AcOXbJz+C2IHG7P6SbWV0ytsPg430AAAYu6Q
  • Thread-topic: [filmscanners] Re: 10D Tony shots
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk


Tony wrote:
>Hah, me too  - only I changed to Delta3200 (@1600) eventually. Well, the
>10d is amazing in bad light. Shortly after I got it, I was walking back
>from a job and did some handheld night street shots @800 which alerted me
>to the potential for seeing in the dark. It has since got me through
>several jobs that would have been impossible on colour film without
>appalling grain and degraded image or (spit) direct flash. The
>post-processing is slow (an overnight Neat Image batch job), but it's one
>area where dig outclasses film  comprehensively. I know of other photog's
>who are equally impressed  by the low-light capability of  the  Nikon D100,
>and the Canon 1DS.

Option of using high ISO make DSLRs very attractive.
I heard, Pentax *istD performs very well at high ISOs. 


Thanks
Ramesh

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.