ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: scanning TMAX 3200



It's true that high quality silver-based B&W film, when properly exposed and
developed, has a higher dynamic range than chromogenic B&W.  It's also true
that it is not a classic "wet darkroom" film, since it's normally developed
by a one-hour type color lab.  However, based on my experience with a
"consumer" film scanner, low priced scanners don't have the dynamic range to
handle the range of density that good B&W negatives can produce, so this may
be a moot point.  The chromogenic films are certainly convenient, especially
for the darkroom challenged, but I don't think that there's one out there
with all the speed that TMAX 3200 offers.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.