[filmscanners] Re: 24bit vs more

["Arthur Entlich" <artistic-1@shaw.ca>]

I didn't write any of this, nor was I even quoted in any of the
exchange.  A bit of prejudicial assumption on your part, perhaps?

As you will note from your own email software, these quotes were written
by Austin.

I also do not use Vuescan, but I have not made any comments about it
relative to this debate, Dickie, oh, I mean David ;-)

Art


David J. Littleboy wrote:

> "Austin Franklin" <austin@darkroom.com> writes:
>
>
> I have little experience with Viewscan,
> <<<<<<<<<<
>
> FWIW, Arthur, your cheapshots against Vuescan are really stupid; you don't
> know what you are talking about. It's a powerful, flexible, scanner driver.
> It's not about "automation" at all. The software provided with scanners does
> a lot more things automatically than Vuescan.
>
>
>  as I have no need for it.  My
> scanner software gives me perfect scans, because I know how to use it.
> Setpoint too and tonal curve tool.  Anything beyond that is purely fluff, at
> least for my scanner.
> <<<<<<<<<
>
> The last I checked, Vuescan doesn't have a curves tool, although it's high
> on the author's list of things to add. What it does have support for is
> color calibration.
>
> David J. Littleboy
> davidjl@gol.com
> Tokyo, Japan
>


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body