ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Re:A scanner question



Well, Preston,

> Occasionally I feel compelled
> to point out that there is no visible difference in printed images (I
> assumed Tom was using an inkjet printer to make his "historic photo
> archive" prints.) from a medium-compression JPEG files of adequate
> resolution and their TIFF brothers, but sometimes it's a lonely battle
> <G>.

You can point that out for only the images YOU have made comparisons on.  It
is simply not true as a blanket statement of everyone's images, and I know
that for a fact.

Austin

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.