ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: CD Longevity


  • To: lexa@lexa.ru
  • Subject: [filmscanners] Re: CD Longevity
  • From: "Rob Geraghty" <robg@wordweb.com>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 10:27:21 +1000
  • References: <3F0B40DA012832A1@mta2.wss.scd.yahoo.com> (added by postmaster@mail.san.yahoo.com)
  • Unsubscribe: mailto:listserver@halftone.co.uk

Arthur Entlich <artistic-1@shaw.ca> wrote:
> Based upon this new info, are CD-RW still considered less reliable than
> current CD-R product?

Out of interest, are there any tests on the predicted longevity of DVD
writeable media?  Is there a difference between DVD-R, DVD+R, DVD-RW or
DVD+RW in terms of reliability?

Someone mentioned about generations of media - while I was in Japan last
year, Toshiba announced an optical disk which stored 10GB of data per side,
as opposed to the current 4.7GB of DVD writeable media.

Rob

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.