ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: scanner dmax discussion



> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of LAURIE SOLOMON
> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 8:29 PM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: scanner dmax discussion
>
>
> Austin,
> We have been through this discussion several times over; I am
> not about to embark on it again, much less start it. :-)
> That topic has always provoked heated discussions involving
> misused terminology and misunderstood concepts with everyone
> claiming theirown use to be the proper and correct usage
> unlike that of others whom they are debating.  Rather than
> solving vagueness and ambiguity by trying to settle on a
> common set of terms have a commonly understood denoted
> concepts, arguments erupt over language and whose notion is
> the real one.

Huh? Would you repeat that? On second thought, forget it.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.