ðòïåëôù 


  áòèé÷ 


Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

  óôáôøé 


  ðåòóïîáìøîïå 


  ðòïçòáííù 



ðéûéôå
ðéóøíá












     áòèé÷ :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans



I was going to ask why you were scanning at 2000 dpi in the first place.
In the three years and thousands of images I've scanned on my SS4000 I
don't think I've ever done that. At any rate, those images do seem to be
excessively noisy, as if something might be wrong. I've recently scanned
some Kodak Portra UC and they look pretty noisy in the shadows at full
res but they print up really well for some reason, stunningly in fact.

Frank Paris
frankparis@comcast.net

> -----Original Message-----
> From: filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk
> [mailto:filmscanners_owner@halftone.co.uk] On Behalf Of
> Harry@vdKrogt.nl
> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:16 PM
> To: frankparis@comcast.net
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Noise in Polaroid SS 4000 scans
>
>
> I just made some pictures on location with Fuji 160 and 400,
> some of the same situation, I will scan them tomorrow. I have
> to look for pictures I made on a lower speed film, or the
> same speed of another brand, I used Kodak 160 NC some time
> ago. I will make some new scans of this film too. I found out
> that scanning the same scene at 4000 dpi resulted in scans
> with a little less noise and with more film grain.
>
> Regards,
>
> Harry

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.