Apache-Talk @lexa.ru 

Inet-Admins @info.east.ru 

Filmscanners @halftone.co.uk 

Security-alerts @yandex-team.ru 

nginx-ru @sysoev.ru 

   


   


   















      :: Filmscanners
Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[filmscanners] Re: comments on using NikonScan/PC





Nagaraj, Ramesh wrote:

> Ed Verkaik wrote:
>

> These dots were there before GEM. GEM removed all these dots and images 
>became smooth; along with the
> dots went the subtle details too. When I say details, I mean, snow had small 
>dark patches caused by shade
> and some of such deatils were lost.
>
>


Although I don't use GEM, I have seen it used on a number of web sites,
and my reaction is it is a bit like melting the emulsion a bit.  I find
it degrades the image by removing the very fine detail.  Personally, I
don't like it.  It also seem to "average" the color to remove small
specks.  The images look "buffed" or something.

Art


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe 
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or 
body



 




Copyright © Lexa Software, 1996-2009.