Filmscanners mailing list archive (filmscanners@halftone.co.uk)
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[filmscanners] Re: comments on using NikonScan/PC
Nagaraj, Ramesh wrote:
> Ed Verkaik wrote:
>
> These dots were there before GEM. GEM removed all these dots and images
>became smooth; along with the
> dots went the subtle details too. When I say details, I mean, snow had small
>dark patches caused by shade
> and some of such deatils were lost.
>
>
Although I don't use GEM, I have seen it used on a number of web sites,
and my reaction is it is a bit like melting the emulsion a bit. I find
it degrades the image by removing the very fine detail. Personally, I
don't like it. It also seem to "average" the color to remove small
specks. The images look "buffed" or something.
Art
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe by mail to listserver@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
|
